If you are just about to start your investing journey and you are considering a multi-asset allocation fund as your first investment, then let me stop you there because it could be a mistake. Let me tell you how.
When you invest in a multi-asset allocation fund, the fund manager decides how much to put into equity, how much to put into debt, and how much to put into gold, silver, and other things, right? But all you see is a single NAV. So you do not get to observe how volatile each of these assets are independently of each other. You do not get to see how when equities fall by 20-30%, your gold comes to rescue, or how when gold goes nowhere for 2, 3, 5 years, your equities deliver the returns that it needed. And how across all the scenarios, the debt offers much-needed stability to your portfolio.
And why is this important? Because in investing, learnings only come from experience. And if you don’t have the experience, and when you have after 10 years, 15 years, large sums of money to invest, you will have no idea how much to allocate to equities, how much to allocate to gold, and how much to allocate to debt. And you will have no idea of what your actual risk appetite is—how much fall in the money you can handle.
There is also a second point where multi-asset allocation fund is a bad idea that I will share in my subsequent post.



